Tuesday, November 30, 2010
Seamus Heaney's "Punishment"
Use of the footnotes helps explain the way Heaney explores human tendencies throughout this poem. Beginning with a description of a young woman who has been murdered for adultery, Heaney (as the footnote explains) reminds us of ancient Germanic peoples. Yet, when he turns his attention to the mistreatment of the “betraying sisters,” women from his own time, Heaney connects the two time periods. Both sets of women, despite the hundreds of years that separate them, are treated brutally for acting outside of what society considers acceptable; therefore, the juxtaposition of these women displays Heaney's belief that humans have the tendency to judge others harshly regardless of the time period in which they live.
Indeed, Heaney does not exclude himself from an exploration of our tendency to be over judgmental and harsh. He realizes his own guilt in having “stood dumb” while Irish women are “cauled in tar” for having relations with British soldiers. Guilty of in-action, Heaney considers his own part in the human mania for judgment as he can mourn the loss of the ancient Germanic woman, but stand passively by as his own contemporaries “[weep] by the railings.”
Nevertheless, despite his momentary self-chastisement, Heaney does take action in the end by calling readers' attention to these terrible human tendencies. One way this is accomplished is through his reminder that even in our “civilized” age, mistreatment can occur. He sarcastically refers to the treatment of his contemporaries as “civilized outrage,” but then reminds readers that such a term is misleading and is actually nothing but “tribal, intimate revenge.” Therefore, by connecting the actions taking place around him to the brutalities of more tribal, instinctual times, Heaney shows that we cannot hide behind the guise of civilization, but must cease such actions before we could ever truly be humane, civilized people.
Sunday, November 21, 2010
Ted Hughes
I am not a huge fan of Ted Hughes’s poetry. I am more interested in his personal life. It is difficult to imagine that both of his wives killed themselves in the same way. What did he do to these women that made them commit suicide? I would think that he might have thought he had something to do with their deaths and perhaps felt like a failure. Someone had mentioned in class that Hughes could be the crow. I think this is a great analysis. In “Crow’s First Lesson,” crow is a failure. He was unable to please God no matter how hard he tried. Perhaps this was Hughes’s way to express his own feelings of disappointment.
Crows are not seen in a positive light. Crows are usually associated with bad omens, problems, and death. I cannot find one positive poem dealing with Crow. I was surprised that Hughes was initially writing Crow as a children’s book. I would never associate Crow with children. Everything Hughes writes is depressing. The Birthday Letters were shocking to me. I thought they would be uplifting, but I should have known they wouldn’t be after reading Crow. “The Dogs Are Eating You Mother” is bizarre. The title itself is disturbing. He talks about her body being destroyed by vultures. He just seems very angry in the poem. He has the same negative attitude throughout all his poetry. I can’t say that I enjoy reading such disturbing poetry.
Last Letter
I’m really intrigued by the relationship between Plath and Hughes. Apparently there was a poem entitled “Last Letter” that was initially one of the “The Birthday Letters” but was withheld from the original publication. It was published recently. I hope everyone will check out the link to some information on the poem. I really enjoyed the news clip that was on the bottom of the page. It talks about the relationship between the two and also contains excerpts of “Last Letter.”
Here is also a link to the full text poem.
http://lovingsylvia.tumblr.com/post/1263482483/last-letter-by-ted-hughes
I can absolutely see how many people would blame Hughes with his infidelities for the death of Plath. I do think it is hard to ignore, however, that obviously Hughes suffered tremendously from her death. The very fact that he wrote “The Birthday Letters” seems to suggest that he never fully recovered from the loss. This is definitely emphasized by “Last Letter.” The last few lines just gave me chills! “Then a voice like a selected weapon/Or a measured injection/Coolly delivered its four words/Deep into my ear: ’Your wife is dead.’” (see link above)
I was also really touched by how Hughes lamented the loss of Plath as his children’s mother (“Life after Death”). He is really ripped apart by the position that his son is put in after Plath’s death. He says, “Great hands of grief were wringing and wringing/ His wet cloth of face…But his mouth betrayed you – it accepted/The spoon in my disembodied hand.”
Thursday, November 18, 2010
Ted Hughes
Wednesday, November 17, 2010
Ted Hughes
I feel as though the life of Hughes was just as big, if not, bigger than his poetry. It is important to separate the two but it is also important to understand the relationship between his work and his life because they truly intertwine. I have learned a lot more about Hughes' work and life in the past few weeks. By doing so I got a better understanding of Hughes and Plath's life together, as well as their work referring to each other. Before reading Hughes' work I thought of him only as Plath's moronic, womanizing ex-husband. Reading his poetry allowed me to realize that he is human, even though I still believe he is was a jerk. His poetry gave me better notification as to what his deeper feelings may have been throughout his life.
Thoughts on Ted Hughes
I'd like to know more about his marriage to Sylvia Plath. This is the first time I've read Hughes' poetry, but I've read Plath's before and liked it as well--the marriage didn't work out, but the time they did spend together must have been quite interesting, to have these two extremely dark and offbeat souls bonded together in marriage!
Birthday letters Ted Hughes
Ted Hughes Life after Death of the Birthday letters was one of the most powerful of the collection. Hughes describe the events and the emotion he went through with his children. like many loved ones of a suicide victims their life is torched and each one of them try to cope and move on from the horror. he begins with the words " what can i tell you that you do not know of life after death"
then goes on to describe his son cries and tears for his mother as he feeds him in his high chair. he also says how even though he is crying his mouth betrays you as he continue to cry and take the food. then he goes on describing the coms state of his daughter as he dresses her and the presence of her death continue to wound her. and later describes how the wolves mourn for them and visit them night after night..and they sing for two orphans as he states "where wolves singing in the forest for two babes, who have turned in their sleep into orphans besides the corps of their mother" which recalls the night she gassed her self while the children were sleeping and slept while their mothers corps was laying on the kitchen floor.